But this hasn’t stopped diehard Myers-Briggs fans seeing themselves within the test’s categories. The backlash against the Myers-Briggs test has been powerful – beyond being shunned by academics, a steady drip of articles over the years have condemned its shaky scientific grounding. Today, this is considered a crucial element of a personality tests. “Basically, there isn't an algorithm that translates how people answer into how they're likely to behave,” explains Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic, professor of business psychology at University College London. Another objection rests on the test’s inability to predict meaningful life outcomes. While the Myers-Briggs test lumps people into “types,” most modern personality tests measure traits on a continuum. In academic circles, however, the test has long been discredited. The test gained widespread popular appeal, and was deployed across enterprise settings in the 80s – something that continues today in some sectors. Based on psychiatrist Carl Jung’s theory of personality, it groups testers into 16 ‘types’ based on their answers to a range of questions designed to assess behaviour and modes of thinking. The Myers-Briggs is a psychometric personality test developed in the middle of the last century by mother and daughter pair, Katharine Cook Briggs and Isabel Briggs Myers.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |